12 Hungary, under the leadership of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, has also taken dramatic steps to address its falling birth rates through a series of populist and heavily financed family policies. These policies are designed not only to boost birth rates but also to cement social norms around traditional family structures.1.Generous Financial Incentives: The government offerssignificant financial incentives, including tax reduction formothers with multiple children, and grants and loans forfamilies to secure housing and vehicles suitable for largerfamilies. Mothers with 4 or more children are exemptedfrom the personal income tax under a certain condition.2.Housing and Vehicle Subsidies: Families receive subsidiesto purchase homes and cars, with additional benefitsfollowing the birth of each child, which aims at reducingthe financial barriers to having more children.3.Cultural and Ideological Motivations: Orbán’s policies aimto keep society uniform and culturally united. He believesthat higher birth rates reduce reliance on immigration. Both Japan and Hungary have invested heavily in financial incentives to encourage higher birth rates, yet both continue to struggle with demographic decline. This suggests that financial measures alone are insufficient to address the complex social, economic, and cultural barriers that contribute to low fertility rates. In Japan, the lack of male involvement in childcare and household duties is a significant issue, with men contributing minimally compared to their female counterparts. This imbalance contributes to the high child penalty rate for women, deterring them from having more children. Both Japan and Hungary illustrate the challenges of reversing low birth rates through policy measures. While financial incentives are a significant component of their strategies, addressing deeper social and cultural issues is crucial for any substantial change in birth rates. Policies need to be more inclusive and considerate of the diverse needs of all potential While these measures have drawn international attention, they have been criticized for primarily benefiting middle and upper-income families. Lower-income families often do not earn enough to benefit from tax breaks or afford additional children even with financial incentives. Additionally, the focus on traditional family models has sparked criticism for not addressing or supporting alternative family structures or choices. In Hungary, on the other hand, the approach has unintentionally fostered inequality and has not effectively targeted the segments of the population that are most likely to be discouraged from having children by economic issues.parents, not just those who already have the means to support larger families. Effective strategies might also include broader social reforms, such as improving gender equality, work-life balance, and social support systems, to create environments easier to raise children. Hungarian Approach to Low Birth Rates Major Initiatives of Hungary’s Family Policies: Comparative Analysis and Critique Conclusion
元のページ ../index.html#13