8 These differences are not simply a matter of which approach is better or worse. Rather, they reflect the underlying healthcare systems, ethical values, and social structures unique to each country. The contrasting approaches offer complementary perspectives that can contribute to the future development of AI in healthcare. the challenges of implementing AI in healthcare. Both countries actively engage with the use of the AI in medical fields, but their responses differ due to institutional and cultural factors. The UK emphasises patients’rights and empirical clinical Japan focuses on aligning AI implementation with the institutions, treating it as a social process. However, Japan’s approach appears relatively weaker in terms of protecting of This report has explored how Japan and the UK address utility, developing institutional frameworks. In contrast, cultural context of medical practice and broader social patients’ rights. 4. Conclusion
元のページ ../index.html#9